Re: request_firmware() hotplug interface, third round and a halve

Manuel Estrada Sainz (ranty@debian.org)
Wed, 21 May 2003 20:36:16 +0200

On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 05:44:56PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 12:23:18AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > +struct firmware_priv {
> > > + char fw_id[FIRMWARE_NAME_MAX];
> > > + struct completion completion;
> > > + struct bin_attribute attr_data;
> > > + struct firmware *fw;
> > > + s32 loading:2;
> > > + u32 abort:1;
> >
> > Why s32 and u32? Why not just ints for both of them?
>
> And for that matter, I don't think there's any point using bitfields,
> 61 bits is not worth it.

Done, I just sent updated patches.

Thanks

Manuel

-- 
--- Manuel Estrada Sainz <ranty@debian.org>
                         <ranty@bigfoot.com>
			 <ranty@users.sourceforge.net>
------------------------ <manuel.estrada@hispalinux.es> -------------------
Let us have the serenity to accept the things we cannot change, courage to
change the things we can, and wisdom to know the difference.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/