Re: request_firmware() hotplug interface, third round and a halve

David Gibson (david@gibson.dropbear.id.au)
Wed, 21 May 2003 17:44:56 +1000

On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 12:23:18AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > +struct firmware_priv {
> > + char fw_id[FIRMWARE_NAME_MAX];
> > + struct completion completion;
> > + struct bin_attribute attr_data;
> > + struct firmware *fw;
> > + s32 loading:2;
> > + u32 abort:1;
>
> Why s32 and u32? Why not just ints for both of them?

And for that matter, I don't think there's any point using bitfields,
61 bits is not worth it.

-- 
David Gibson			| For every complex problem there is a
david@gibson.dropbear.id.au	| solution which is simple, neat and
				| wrong.
http://www.ozlabs.org/people/dgibson
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/