Re: Recent changes to sysctl.h breaks glibc

[H. Peter Anvin]

William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> 
> On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 03:46:01PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> 
>>Unfortunately "the current policy" is unrealistic, and repeating it
>>doesn't make it any less so.
> 
> No contest there; unfortunately unrealistic amounts of work seem to
> be required to get around the general state of affairs at times. =(
> Does it really have to be 2.7? It seems most of this would be header
> reorganization with no runtime impact on the kernel.
> 

It is; it doesn't have to be in 2.7 if someone would be willing to step
up and do it in time for 2.6.  Personally I wouldn't have a prayer; I'm
already way to deep into too many projects...

	-=hpa