Re: Recent changes to sysctl.h breaks glibc

[William Lee Irwin III]

On Mon, 2003-05-19 at 12:51, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> IIRC you're supposed to use some sort of sanitized copy, not the things
>> directly. IMHO the current state of affairs sucks as there is no
>> standard set of ABI headers, but grabbing them right out of the kernel
>> is definitely not the way to go.

On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 01:14:02PM +0200, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
> Ok, anybody know of an effort to get this done ?
> Also, what about odd things that are more kernel dependant
> like imon support in fam for example ?  The imon.h will not
> be in the 'sanitized copy' ....

It probably has to be hand-crafted for cases like the above.

I'm unaware of anyone actually doing anything about this.

-- wli