Re: Route cache performance under stress

David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Sat, 17 May 2003 15:09:33 -0700 (PDT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Andreas Dilger: "Re: [PATCH] laptop mode, #2"
Previous message: Paul Mundt: "Re: Dreamcast framebuffer updates."
In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: Route cache performance under stress"

From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 09:31:04 +0200

The hash collision problem appears to be resolved, but not the more
general performance issues. Or are there any kernels without a
routing cache?

I think your criticism of the routing cache is not well
founded.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andreas Dilger: "Re: [PATCH] laptop mode, #2"
Previous message: Paul Mundt: "Re: Dreamcast framebuffer updates."
In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: Route cache performance under stress"