Re: USB not accepting addresses in bk9

[Greg KH]

On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 03:53:18PM -0400, David van Hoose wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> >On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 12:00:03AM -0400, David van Hoose wrote:
> >
> >>Sometime between 2.5.69-bk4 and 2.5.69-bk8, something with related to 
> >>the USB was messed up. I get the below lines in my dmesg.
> >>hub 2-0:0: new USB device on port 1, assigned address 2
> >>usb 2-1: USB device not accepting new address=2 (error=-110)
> >>hub 2-0:0: new USB device on port 1, assigned address 3
> >>usb 2-1: USB device not accepting new address=3 (error=-110)
> >>
> >>The first device is my Logitech Cordless Optical Trackball.
> >>The second device is my TI USB Graphlink.
> >>
> >>The Trackball still works. Not sure about the graphlink as I don't have 
> >>the software installed yet. :-/
> >
> >How can the device work if the USB bus rejected it?  Also, does
> >/proc/interrupts increment for the USB controller when you plug a device
> >in?
> 
> No idea. It seems to increment the usb line in /proc/interrupts.
> I've attached a dmesg with verbose debugging.

-ENOATTACHMENT :)

> >>I used the same config for bk4 as I did for bk8. It've attached my 
> >>config for bk9 since it is the same anyway.
> >
> >Care to do a binary search of bk4 to bk8 to try to find the problem?
> >Should only take you 2 reboots at most :)
> 
> What do you want me to do? I don't know if I have the skills yet to code 
> for the kernel, so the least I can do is test it. :-)

Ok, bk4 works for you and bk8 doesn't.  So try the following:
	- test bk6
	- if bk6 fails test bk5
		- if bk5 fails, the problem happened between bk4 and bk5
		- if bk5 works, the problem happened bewtwen bk5 and bk6
	- if bk6 works test bk7
		- if bk7 fails, the problem happened between bk6 and bk7
		- if bk7 works, the problem happened between bk7 and bk8

And let us know what the result is, please.

thanks,

greg k-h