Re: [PATCH] 2.5.68 FUTEX support should be optional

H. Peter Anvin (hpa@zytor.com)
14 May 2003 13:54:09 -0700

Followup to: <Pine.LNX.4.55.0305141342030.4539@bigblue.dev.mcafeelabs.com>
By author: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> Not only. Like Ulrich was saying, the config documentation should heavily
> warn the wild config guy about the consequences of a 'NO' over there.
>

How about creating a master option like we have for experimental?
Something like "Allow removal of essential components?" (CONFIG_EMBEDDED)

-hpa

-- 
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
Architectures needed: ia64 m68k mips64 ppc ppc64 s390 s390x sh v850 x86-64
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/