>You didn't test this change. x->type is a pointer, not a place where
>you put XFRM_STATE_DEAD, a simple compile test would have alerted
>this to you.
>
>
Sorry about that, i recreated the fix in a different tree and broke it.
>This also means you couldn't possibly have tested if this even
>makes the assertion go away, it couldn't possibly have fixed this..
>
>The correct fix, of course, is to set x->km.state to this value.
>This is what I've done in my tree.
>
>Please be a LOT more careful with your changes.
>
Promised.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/