Re: [PATCH] 2.5.68 FUTEX support should be optional

Ulrich Drepper (drepper@redhat.com)
Wed, 14 May 2003 12:44:50 -0700


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Dave Jones wrote:

> That seems to imply that the current glibc makes futexes mandatory,
> which surely isn't the case or we'd not be able to run with 2.4 and earlier
> kernels.

Current == current development. LinuxThreads is not developed anymore
and with nptl futexes are mandatory.

- --
- --------------. ,-. 444 Castro Street
Ulrich Drepper \ ,-----------------' \ Mountain View, CA 94041 USA
Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `---------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+wpyy2ijCOnn/RHQRAv88AJ4mZDNFyre2J6Pku7jkE2JSvV4aBgCgufYG
70N4RNLFQzDNIk3id3UHJUk=
=LqUF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/