This is just the arch specific linker bits for the early initialization
for security modules patch. Does this look sane for these arches?
--- 1.18/arch/sparc64/vmlinux.lds.S Wed Apr 2 00:42:56 2003
+++ edited/arch/sparc64/vmlinux.lds.S Mon May 12 16:17:00 2003
@@ -68,6 +68,9 @@
__con_initcall_start = .;
.con_initcall.init : { *(.con_initcall.init) }
__con_initcall_end = .;
+ __security_initcall_start = .;
+ .security_initcall.init : { *(.security_initcall.init) }
+ __security_initcall_end = .;
. = ALIGN(8192);
__initramfs_start = .;
.init.ramfs : { *(.init.ramfs) }
--- 1.16/arch/sparc/vmlinux.lds.S Wed Apr 2 00:42:56 2003
+++ edited/arch/sparc/vmlinux.lds.S Mon May 12 16:17:00 2003
@@ -62,6 +62,9 @@
__con_initcall_start = .;
.con_initcall.init : { *(.con_initcall.init) }
__con_initcall_end = .;
+ __security_initcall_start = .;
+ .security_initcall.init : { *(.security_initcall.init) }
+ __security_initcall_end = .;
. = ALIGN(4096);
__initramfs_start = .;
.init.ramfs : { *(.init.ramfs) }
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/