Re: irq balancing: performance disaster

Zwane Mwaikambo (zwane@linuxpower.ca)
Sun, 11 May 2003 08:58:57 -0400 (EDT)


On Sun, 11 May 2003, William Lee Irwin III wrote:

> On Sun, May 11, 2003 at 08:17:53AM -0400, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> > It was a bug in 2.4, fixed in Alan's tree by setting target_cpus to 0xff
> > (previously cpu_online_map). There is no noirqbalance option in 2.4
> > because there is no in kernel irq balancer.
>
> I vaguely like this notion because it removes a #ifdef and cleans up
> a tiny bit of its surroundings. But it's not quite a one-liner.

Nice, it's during init too so there really is no need for any sort of
optimisation, the inline can also go and make it __init.

Zwane

-- 
function.linuxpower.ca
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/