Re: The disappearing sys_call_table export.

Werner Almesberger (wa@almesberger.net)
Sat, 10 May 2003 15:26:27 -0300


Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> The only solution for this is to check/audit/log things after the ONE
> copy. Eg not by overriding the syscall but inside the syscall.

Well, not exactly the _only_ one. Inferior alternatives include

- tracking all user memory accesses, and protecting those pages
against modifications by other processes (but this adds a
deadlock risk)

- like above, but copy all such data to/from a user space area
that is then protected

- like above, but use kernel space instead, then use
set_fs(KERNEL_DS)

Which probably just proves that there are always more painful ways
to do things :-)

- Werner

-- 
  _________________________________________________________________________
 / Werner Almesberger, Buenos Aires, Argentina         wa@almesberger.net /
/_http://www.almesberger.net/____________________________________________/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/