Re: top stack (l)users for 2.5.69

[Ingo Oeser]

On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 01:38:56PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> I've written a few of the stack reduction patches.  Lots of ioctl functions
> need work, so gcc handling it better would be good to have.
> 
> I have mostly used kmalloc/kfree, but using automatic variables is certainly
> cleaner to write (code).  One of the patches that I did just made each ioctl
> cmd call a separate function, and then each separate function was able to use
> automatic variables on the stack instead of kmalloc/kfree.  I prefer this
> method when it's feasible (and until gcc can handle these cases).

Wouldn't be a explicit union a better solution for the
switch-statement-issue? 

That way you still can use stack, are using even less of it and
have still all cases in place.

Regards

Ingo Oeser
-- 
Marketing ist die Kunst, Leuten Sachen zu verkaufen, die sie
nicht brauchen, mit Geld, was sie nicht haben, um Leute zu
beeindrucken, die sie nicht moegen.