Re: The disappearing sys_call_table export.

viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk
Thu, 8 May 2003 11:20:47 +0100


On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 09:59:43AM +0000, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 11:58:33AM +0200, Terje Eggestad wrote:
> > I guess something like this:
> >
> > typedef int (*syscall_hook_t)(void * arg1, void * arg2, void * arg3,
> > void * arg4, void * arg5, void * arg6);
> >
> > #define HOOK_IN_FLAG 0x1
> > #define HOOK_OUT_FLAG 0x2
> >
> > opaquehandle = int register_syscall_hook(int syscall_nr, syscall_hook_t
> > hook_function, int flags);
> > int unregister(int opaquehandle);
> >
> > I'd make a stab at it if I knew that it stood a chance of getting
> > accepted.
>
> I dont think it has.

I think it could, actually - who maintains fortunes these days? It's
a bit too long, though...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/