Re: [PATCH] kmalloc_percpu
Rusty Russell (rusty@rustcorp.com.au)
Thu, 08 May 2003 10:53:48 +1000
In message <20030506223751.2b49024a.akpm@digeo.com> you write:
> Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
> >
> > I figured that since the allocator is going to be there anyway, it
> > made sense to express kmalloc_percpu() in those terms. If you think
> > the price is too high, I can respect that.
>
> I suggest that we use your new mechanism to fix DEFINE_PERCPU() in modules,
> and leave kmalloc_percpu() as it is for now.
Sure, we can revisit it later if it makes sense. After all, there's
supposed to be this freeze thing...
I'll prepare a new, minimal patch.
Rusty.
--
Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/