Re: PATCH: Replace current->state with set_current_state in 2.5.6 8
Gerrit Huizenga (gh@us.ibm.com)
Tue, 06 May 2003 19:01:27 -0700
On Tue, 06 May 2003 18:24:56 PDT, "Randy.Dunlap" wrote:
>
> On Tue, 6 May 2003 17:33:26 -0700 "Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky" <inaky.perez-gonzalez@intel.com> wrote:
>
> | However, I'd suggest to post this into the Kernel Janitors mailing list and
> | let one of the big guys there swipe it in.
> |
>
> Yes, the KJ list has already seen this patch and commented on some version
> of it.
> Then it needs some exposure, like living in -ac or -mm or -pick1,
> or at least some testing (everyday usage) by a few people, with reports
> from them.
>
> And I don't really want to review a 176 KB patch (although I did already
> look over most of it a few days ago). Do people want to take portions
> of it for review and then see about Alan merging it, e.g.?
Hmm. Has anyone considered a "Kernel Janitor's" tree? More specifically,
a patch set, much like -ac or -mm, with the current cleanups so they
can be tested, pulled, run through automated batch testing, etc.?
gerrit
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/