Re: 2.5.69 just doesn't boot (neither does anything > .67)

[Brett]

On Tue, 6 May 2003, Daniel Pittman wrote:

> On Tue, 6 May 2003, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > Previously Brett wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
> >> and anyway, can you provide any backup that this will fix it ?? what
> >> changed between 2.5.66 and 2.5.67 to stop grub loading the kernel ? 
> >> why hasn't anyone else reported this ???
> > 
> > I couldn't boot 2.5 at all until I upgraded an ancient grub. Having
> > a recent bootloader is never a bad thing though, and 0.92 is pretty
> > old.
> 
> 0.92 is successfully booting 2.5.6[89] here, and 0.93 (Debian or
> upstream) fails to boot on most of my machines here.
> 
> YMMV, of course, but 0.92 works for me.
> 

yea, i was very dubious that grub was the problem
as it is, i've upgraded to 0.93, and the problem remains

thanks,

	/ Brett