Because the OP violated the lkml FAQ section 1.18:
All problems discovered whilst such a module is loaded must be reported
to the vendor of that module, /not/ the Linux kernel hackers and the
linux-kernel mailing list. [...] "oops" reports marked as tainted are of
no use to the kernel developers and will be ignored.
Davem just restated this fact with the same admittedly strong wording.
Felix von Leitner accused him of unprofessionalism and zealotry. That is
what I would call an offence.
> It's a shame that some people seem to think that lots of hard work
> entitles them to be rude and condescending, while really important
> contributors like Alan Cox, Ingo and akpm can be polite and helpful, even
> when they are correcting someone or disagreeing on an approach to a
> problem.
It's even more shocking if a user insults a kernel developer and expects
this developer (or one of his peers) to actually take care of the
problem. wli chose to investigate the report anyway, something not to be
taken for granted.
Hey, if I insulted Al Viro I'd never expect him to help me (respond,
point out mistakes etc.) anymore. Besides that, Al saved me from diving
into floppy.c, for which I'm still thankful.
Chris: Just a heads up - you may get private hate mail from Peter
"Firefly" Lund like I did because you pointed out a mistake of the OP.
So be warned about it.
Carl-Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/