btw I think the line in handle_IRQ_event that reads
if (retval != 1) {
should be
if (retval != IRQ_HANDLED) {
but that's just a nit.
Regards -- Andy
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Morton [mailto:akpm@digeo.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 05, 2003 2:16 PM
> To: Nicolas
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Grover, Andrew
> Subject: Re: oops 2.5.68 ohci1394/ IRQ/acpi
> Importance: High
>
>
> Nicolas <linux@1g6.biz> wrote:
> >
> >
> > May 5 13:36:56 hal9003 kernel: irq 9: nobody cared!
> > ...
> > May 5 13:36:56 hal9003 kernel: handlers:
> > May 5 13:36:56 hal9003 kernel: [acpi_irq+0/17] (acpi_irq+0x0/0x11)
> > May 5 13:36:56 hal9003 kernel: [<c01c1ff0>] (acpi_irq+0x0/0x11)
>
> Look like the ACPI IRQ handler isn't returning an appropriate value.
>
> Can you test this patch?
>
> diff -puN drivers/acpi/osl.c~acpi-irq-ret-fix drivers/acpi/osl.c
> --- 25/drivers/acpi/osl.c~acpi-irq-ret-fix Mon May 5 14:14:24 2003
> +++ 25-akpm/drivers/acpi/osl.c Mon May 5 14:14:38 2003
> @@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ acpi_os_table_override (struct acpi_tabl
> static irqreturn_t acpi_irq(int irq, void *dev_id, struct
> pt_regs *regs) {
> - return (*acpi_irq_handler)(acpi_irq_context);
> + return (*acpi_irq_handler)(acpi_irq_context) ?
> IRQ_HANDLED : IRQ_NONE;
> }
>
> acpi_status
>
> _
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/