Re: [PATCH] kmalloc_percpu

David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Mon, 05 May 2003 22:57:48 -0700 (PDT)


From: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 23:55:49 -0700

How about we leave kmalloc_per_cpu as-is (it uses kmalloc()), and
only apply Rusty's new code to DEFINE_PER_CPU?

I propose to make it use kmalloc() all the time.

It simply doesn't make sense to use a pool given what you've
shown me. If we've decided that any limit whatsover is bad,
why impose any limit at all? Smells like bad design frankly.

Normal DEFINE_PER_CPU() need not a pool, therefore we don't need
a pool for anything.

Make kmalloc_per_cpu() merely a convenience macro, made up of existing
non-percpu primitives.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/