On Mon, 05 May 2003 12:00:15 MDT, Steven Cole said:
> Perhaps two uptimes could be kept. The current concept of uptime would
> remain as is, analogous to the reign of a king (the current kernel), and
> a new integrated uptime would be analogous to the life of a dynasty. The
> dynasty uptime would be one of the many things the new kernel learned
> about on booting. This new dynasty uptime could become quite long if
> everything keeps on ticking.
Make sure you handle the case of a dynasty that starts on a 2.7.13 kernel
and is finally deposed by a power failure in 2.7.39.
--==_Exmh_-1876400151P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQE+tqrVcC3lWbTT17ARAnImAKCkobfhiQB38EJnBT8hZ9Exw9x91QCgr4zJ
7wEJoMp7pR4si/SpgpGxDHs=
=rZRL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_-1876400151P--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/