Re: TASK_UNMAPPED_BASE & stack location
H. Peter Anvin (hpa@zytor.com)
25 Apr 2003 14:01:44 -0700
Followup to: <459930000.1051302738@[10.10.2.4]>
By author: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> Is there any good reason we can't remove TASK_UNMAPPED_BASE, and just shove
> libraries directly above the program text? Red Hat seems to have patches to
> dynamically tune it on a per-processes basis anyway ...
>
> Moreover, can we put the stack back where it's meant to be, below the
> program text, in that wasted 128MB of virtual space? Who really wants
> > 128MB of stack anyway (and can't fix their app)?
>
That space is NULL pointer trap zone. NULL pointer trapping -> good.
-hpa
--
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
Architectures needed: ia64 m68k mips64 ppc ppc64 s390 s390x sh v850 x86-64
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/