Re: RE:cciss patches for 2.4.21-rc1, 4 of 4

[Jens Axboe]

On Fri, Apr 25 2003, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-04-25 at 00:12, [e-mail] wrote:
> > 20030424
> > 
> > Changes:
> > 	1. Sets the DMA mask to 64 bits. Removes RH's code for the DMA mask.
> > 
> > diff -urN lx2421rc1-p3/drivers/block/cciss.c lx2421rc1/drivers/block/cciss.c
> > --- lx2421rc1-p3/drivers/block/cciss.c	Wed Apr 23 14:40:48 2003
> > +++ lx2421rc1/drivers/block/cciss.c	Wed Apr 23 14:51:55 2003
> > @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@
> >  #define NR_CMDS		 128 /* #commands that can be outstanding */
> >  #define MAX_CTLR 8
> >  
> > -#define CCISS_DMA_MASK	0xFFFFFFFF	/* 32 bit DMA */
> > +#define CCISS_DMA_MASK 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF /* 64 bit DMA */
> >  
> >  static ctlr_info_t *hba[MAX_CTLR];
> >  
> > @@ -2861,17 +2861,6 @@
> >  	hba[i]->ctlr = i;
> >  	hba[i]->pdev = pdev;
> >  
> > -	/* configure PCI DMA stuff */
> > -	if (!pci_set_dma_mask(pdev, (u64) 0xffffffffffffffff))
> > -		printk("cciss: using DAC cycles\n");
> > -	else if (!pci_set_dma_mask(pdev, (u64) 0xffffffff))
> > -		printk("cciss: not using DAC cycles\n");
> > -	else {
> > -		printk("cciss: no suitable DMA available\n");
> > -		free_hba(i);
> > -		return -ENODEV;
> > -	}
> > -		
> 
> 
> this is wrong. The code there is EXACTLY what is needed as per
> Documentation/DMA-mapping.txt, removing it is a bug.

Agree, besides, it was never RH code, dunno where that idea came from?

-- 
Jens Axboe