Hmm, what would you think of changing the xattr_trusted security
model to fit your needs? It's so far unused outside XFS and there's
maybe a chance changing it.
> but it would be easy to
> make the xattr_security.c handler more like xattr_trusted.c in terms of
> allowing arbitrary extensions of a "security." prefix. Is that more to
> your liking, or do you truly want a separate handler for each security
> module?
It's fine with me.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/