Re: [PATCH] Extended Attributes for Security Modules against 2.5.68

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 02:35:59PM -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> The idea of using separate attribute names for each security module was
> already discussed at length when I posted the original RFC, and I've
> already made the case that this is not desirable.  Please see the
> earlier discussion.

No.  It's not acceptable that the same ondisk structure has a different
meaning depending on loaded modules.  If the xattrs have a different
meaning they _must_ have a different name.