Re: IEEE-1394 problem on init [ was Re: Linux 2.4.21-rc1 ]
Ben Collins (bcollins@debian.org)
Wed, 23 Apr 2003 10:44:27 -0400
> I entirely agree.
>
> However, the patch we are discussing has only *6 days*. If you had
> submitted it 2 months ago, there wouldn't be such problems.
>
> [BTW: searching back the l-k archives doesn't find any occurances of
> your patch. I guess you sended it directly to Marcelo...]
>
> > Then after a long huge pause, it suddenly goes -rc. Should that leave me
> > stuck? Don't think so.
>
> Sure, you should continue development and submit a fresh new version
> ready to be tested in 2.4.22-pre1/pre2.
>
> As for 2.4.21, well, we want something pretty well tested. Will this
> be the case with your new mega-patch ? I don't think so. The safest
> is to go back to a version which worked. At least the bugs of that
> version are known, which is not the case for the new version.
Mega patch? I hardly call it a mega patch. It's mostly cleanups and it
was taken from an existing branch. Stuff that is already in Linus' tree.
--
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
Deqo - http://www.deqo.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/