--=_courier-26566-1050997887-0001-2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 06:05:40AM +0000, Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
> printk(retval
> ? "irq event %d: bogus retval mask %x\n"
> : "irq %d: nobody cared!\n",
> irq,=20
> retval);
Uhm, the first printk string takes two parameters, and the second one=20
only one parameter... how about this cosmetic patch? Better some
superflous information than printk params mismatch. Not tested,
obvious.=20
diff -u -r1.31 irq.c
--- arch/i386/kernel/irq.c 21 Apr 2003 20:10:51 -0000 1.31
+++ arch/i386/kernel/irq.c 22 Apr 2003 06:31:10 -0000
@@ -225,7 +225,7 @@
count--;
printk(retval
? "irq event %d: bogus retval mask %x\n"
- : "irq %d: nobody cared!\n",
+ : "irq %d: nobody cared! (retval %x)\n",
irq,=20
retval);
}
--=20
Muli Ben-Yehuda
http://www.mulix.org
--=_courier-26566-1050997887-0001-2
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+pO8/KRs727/VN8sRAkKXAKCEbrSMcBvxwHNMsGV61ParVuMh6ACfYPYB
zeUnUofzK/NwerWNv0jW9rE=
=5Fnc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=_courier-26566-1050997887-0001-2--