Re: Are linux-fs's drive-fault-tolerant by concept?

John Bradford (john@grabjohn.com)
Mon, 21 Apr 2003 13:14:38 +0100 (BST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: "[PATCH] devfs: switch over ubd to ->devfs_name" breaks ubd/sysfs"
Previous message: 20030421130341.06d60830.skraw@ithnet.com: "20030421130341.06d60830.skraw@ithnet.com"
In reply to: Stephan von Krawczynski: "Re: Are linux-fs's drive-fault-tolerant by concept?"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: Are linux-fs's drive-fault-tolerant by concept?"

> > > And again, how do you think this should work out on your _root_
> > > partition? (see below)
> >
> > 1. Hot plug a new disk
>
> On Linux IDE ??
>
> Are you sure?

Yes.

John.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: "[PATCH] devfs: switch over ubd to ->devfs_name" breaks ubd/sysfs"
Previous message: 20030421130341.06d60830.skraw@ithnet.com: "20030421130341.06d60830.skraw@ithnet.com"
In reply to: Stephan von Krawczynski: "Re: Are linux-fs's drive-fault-tolerant by concept?"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: Are linux-fs's drive-fault-tolerant by concept?"