Re: 2.5.66-mm3 - bad ext2 performance ?

William Lee Irwin III (wli@holomorphy.com)
Tue, 15 Apr 2003 14:06:24 -0700

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: John Bradford: "Re: statistics for this mailinglist"
Previous message: Mads Christensen: "named problems!"
In reply to: Badari Pulavarty: "2.5.66-mm3 - bad ext2 performance ?"
Next in thread: Andreas Dilger: "Re: 2.5.66-mm3 - bad ext2 performance ?"

On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 02:00:05PM -0700, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> This is kind of extreem. But I have 1070 LUNS and I mkfs/mounted (ext2) all
> these and running "fsx" on all of them.
> I see very bad IO rate on the machine. fsx with O_DIRECT seems to be
> doing okay. Any ideas on why regular filesystem (buffered) IO sucks ?
> I dont' see even cache increasing ..

Can we get a "before" profile on the same machine to compare against?

-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: John Bradford: "Re: statistics for this mailinglist"
Previous message: Mads Christensen: "named problems!"
In reply to: Badari Pulavarty: "2.5.66-mm3 - bad ext2 performance ?"
Next in thread: Andreas Dilger: "Re: 2.5.66-mm3 - bad ext2 performance ?"