--=_courier-18723-1050333912-0001-2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 04:57:26PM +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
> Is it save and well supported to run devfs on 2.4.21-preX ?
I think asking if devfs is safe round here is probably a bad
idea. You might get an answer. At length. :)
However, it works for me (2.4.21-pre5-ac3), and has worked for many
previous versions of 2.4.
> Do all drivers support devfs?
I've not met one which doesn't, but then I don't have lots of
hardware to test on.
> Or should I wait for 2.6?
The udev stuff in 2.6 looks like it might become very nice indeed,
but you don't have to wait for that to use devfs.
Hugo.
-- === Hugo Mills: hugo@... carfax.org.uk | darksatanic.net | lug.org.uk === PGP key: 1C335860 from wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net or http://www.carfax.org.uk --- Hey, Virtual Memory! Now I can have a *really big* ramdisk! -----=_courier-18723-1050333912-0001-2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+mtKzssJ7whwzWGARAppVAJ0btikx1dx7IFpX2cR6ea0odToOCwCeJDE/ O9IfAGe8fxomAIm4KS8tEoE= =6F16 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=_courier-18723-1050333912-0001-2--