Re: [ANNOUNCE] udev 0.1 release

[Joel Becker]

On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 12:38:49PM -0700, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> No doubt. And then you get into the situation where the devices themselves 
> have names and/or UUIDs, and you want that to be incorporated into the 
> device name. As it stands today, the only way to achieve that is pass that 
> information to device-mapper so it can create devices with those names.

	Oh, I don't want that ever in the name.  I don't want to have to
know much about my disks, except that once the association is there,
it's there until I delete it.

> Personally, I wouldn't be upset if _all_ "physical volumes" (meaning an 
> accessible block devices or portion thereof) appeared under /dev/volume/... 
> Even logical volumes could be done that way, since they have names as well. 
> I don't really see the need to have "whole disks", "partitions" and other 
> types of volumes in separate directories under /dev, but then I may be way 
> off base with the rest of the world wants to do :-)

	There are multiple reasons.  I need to know what's a disk so I
can configure it.  I need to know what's a partition or a logical volume
so I can put filesystems on it.
	It's always fun these days when folks try to use 'whole disks'
and 'partitions' as equivalent things.  They are indeed from a block
device standpoint, but they aren't from an administration standpoint.

Joel

-- 

Life's Little Instruction Book #99

	"Think big thoughts, but relish small pleasures."

Joel Becker
Senior Member of Technical Staff
Oracle Corporation
E-mail: [e-mail]
Phone: [phone]