Re: Isn't sd_major() broken ?

[Pete Zaitcev]

> --- drivers/scsi/sd.c.org	Wed Apr  9 13:12:38 2003
> +++ drivers/scsi/sd.c	Thu Apr 10 11:01:45 2003
> @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ static int sd_major(int major_idx)
>  	case 1 ... 7:
>  		return SCSI_DISK1_MAJOR + major_idx - 1;
>  	case 8 ... 15:
> -		return SCSI_DISK8_MAJOR + major_idx;
> +		return SCSI_DISK8_MAJOR + major_idx - 8;
>  	default:
>  		BUG();
>  		return 0;	/* shut up gcc */
> 

Yes this seems good.

One is left to wonder, however, why 2.5 version is not using
a little array of majors here.

-- Pete