Re: CONFIG_INPUT problems

[Martin J. Bligh]

>> I thought about inverting the logic, and creating CONFIG_HEADLESS
>> which is !CONFIG_INPUT basically ... but changing all the stuff
>> depending on CONFIG_INPUT is rather invasive. So I was thinking of
>> something like
>> 
>> CONFIG_HEADLESS
>> 	bool "headless console support
>> 	default "n"
>> 
>> if HEADLESS = y
>> 	define_bool CONFIG_INPUT = n
>> else
>> 	define_bool CONFIG_INPUT = y
>> endif
> 
> config INPUT
> 	default y if !HEADLESS

I don't see how that'll work ... we already have it defaulting to y,
but there's a previous setting that's 'n' from the 2.4 config file
they're upgrading from ... and that overrides the default, right?

I think in general, that's the right behaviour (else you'd override
your previous settings every time). It's just that in this case, it
creates a serious user problem that we really need to fix. Personally,
I'd be happy to just force it to on all the time, but I suspect that'd
get me lynched ;-)

>> or something vaguely along those lines ... except there doesn't
>> seem to be a way I can see to force a config option on from the
>> new config system? So that's actually a more general question, I guess ;-)
> 
> I know, this has been requested a few times, I hope to have something 
> soon. (It's more a time problem.)

OK, thanks.

M.