Looking at those sites, it appears that the development at
"http://lists.insecure.org/lists/linux-kernel/2003/Feb/0987.html."
which I had pointed is based on the SGI's dump scheme. Same
for the one you pointed to.
The other scheme I poinited to (from Mission Critical Linux/MCLX)
seems to have some strong points too. Any pointers to discussions
about why the LKCD work seems to more active than the
MCLX one?
Best regards,
-Arun.
On Tuesday 08 April 2003 07:14 pm, Matt D. Robinson wrote:
> Please look at the lkcd-devel mailing archives. There is
> at least one group working on a PPC port of LKCD
>
> http://sourceforge.net/mail/?group_id=2726
>
> --Matt
>
> On Tue, 2003-04-08 at 13:47, Arun Dharankar wrote:
> > Greetings.
> >
> > >From what I able to find from some searching around, the implementation
> >
> > by MCLX ("http://oss.missioncriticallinux.com/projects/mcore/") is being
> > carried on at
> > http://lists.insecure.org/lists/linux-kernel/2003/Feb/0987.html.
> >
> > Looking at these patches, I can only see x86 architecture support for
> > in memory kernel crash dump support. Is anyone actively working on the
> > PowerPC architecture?
> >
> > Best regards,
> > -Arun.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/