I don't think many people will argue that dynamic assignments are evil,
but I think you will find a lot of people very nervous about switching to
them and the risk involved with doing so.
David Lang
On Tue, 8 Apr 2003, Werner Almesberger wrote:
> Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 19:53:05 -0300
> From: Werner Almesberger <wa@almesberger.net>
> To: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: 64-bit kdev_t - just for playing
>
> Roman Zippel wrote:
> > Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 22:10:11 +0200 (CEST)
> [...]
> > Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 23:57:56 +0200 (CEST)
> [...]
> > Ok, Peter refuses to give me an answer to that,
>
> That was a quick conclusion, after less than two hours :-)
>
> Anyway, I agree with your general concern. It only seems good
> engineering practice to also look at the numbering schemes that
> are supposed to go with the device number enlargement.
>
> Or, alternatively, to make sure that it's trivial to make further
> enlargements (or shrinkages), if the need for them should arise.
> I didn't look at the issue in detail, but perhaps the latter is
> the case ?
>
> - Werner
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________________
> / Werner Almesberger, Buenos Aires, Argentina wa@almesberger.net /
> /_http://www.almesberger.net/____________________________________________/
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/