Re: [PATCH] new syscall: flink

[H. Peter Anvin]

Bill Rugolsky Jr. wrote:
> 
> We discussed this previously; I described the problems with
> existing semantics, and on 2000/020/29 you wrote:
> 
> http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&threadm=fa.iqoa6kv.flii0q%40ifi.uio.no&rnum=1&prev=/groups%3Fhl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26oe%3DUTF-8%26q%3Dhpa%2Brugolsky%26btnG%3DGoogle%2BSearch
> 
>   "I'm hoping to fix this in 2.5.  The problem is that the way open() is
>   done in the VFS *requires* the creation of a new filestructure."
> 
> I'm still open to suggestions. ;-)
> 

I suggested at one point the following change:

Instead of having the filesystem open() method being passed in a pointer 
to already allocated, partially initialized file structure, that code 
should be moved to a library function, and instead let the open() method 
return a struct file *.  That way open() could either return a reference 
to an already-allocated file or a new one.

	-hpa