Re: objrmap and vmtruncate

[Martin J. Bligh]

>> > 	14.91s user 75.30s system 24% cpu 6:15.84 total
>> 
>> Isn't the intent to use sys_remap_file_pages for these sort of workloads
>> anyway? In which case partial objrmap = rmap for these tests, so we're
>> still OK?
> 
> What matters is the worst case not the best case. Users will do non
> optimal things on a regular basis. 

Humpf. Well I have a fairly simple plan to fix it now. I'll either publish
some code or the plan later today, once I've thought about it a bit more.

M.