> Ok, I was too lazy to check. Anyway, the test-patch is worth trying, since
> one of the areas fixed had no pre-emption protection regardless (ie it
> used just a plain "smp_processor_id()"), and the patch should be
> technically equivalent (just uglier) to a proper get_cpu().
Yah, I just looked, and I noticed that too.
Whether or not this fixes it for Wayne, I think the right thing to do is
replace the first smp_processor_id() with get_cpu(), too.
Robert Love
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/