Shouldn't there be an accompanying change to drivers/base/cpu.c? I had
sent a patch that fixed all three, I believe. Did the cpu changes get
dropped?
-Matt
>
> diff -urpN -X /home/fletch/.diff.exclude mm2/drivers/base/memblk.c mm2-warnfix/drivers/base/memblk.c
> --- mm2/drivers/base/memblk.c Tue Apr 1 08:05:55 2003
> +++ mm2-warnfix/drivers/base/memblk.c Tue Apr 1 08:08:36 2003
> @@ -50,9 +50,13 @@ int __init register_memblk(struct memblk
> int __init register_memblk_type(void)
> {
> int error;
> - if (!(error = devclass_register(&memblk_devclass)))
> - if (error = driver_register(&memblk_driver))
> +
> + error = devclass_register(&memblk_devclass);
> + if (!error) {
> + error = driver_register(&memblk_driver);
> + if (error)
> devclass_unregister(&memblk_devclass);
> + }
> return error;
> }
> postcore_initcall(register_memblk_type);
> diff -urpN -X /home/fletch/.diff.exclude mm2/drivers/base/node.c mm2-warnfix/drivers/base/node.c
> --- mm2/drivers/base/node.c Tue Apr 1 08:05:55 2003
> +++ mm2-warnfix/drivers/base/node.c Tue Apr 1 08:07:36 2003
> @@ -92,9 +92,13 @@ int __init register_node(struct node *no
> int __init register_node_type(void)
> {
> int error;
> - if (!(error = devclass_register(&node_devclass)))
> - if (error = driver_register(&node_driver))
> +
> + error = devclass_register(&node_devclass);
> + if (!error) {
> + error = driver_register(&node_driver);
> + if (error)
> devclass_unregister(&node_devclass);
> + }
> return error;
> }
> postcore_initcall(register_node_type);
>
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/