> And, patch does not seem optimal. I'd take a look at very soon.
Here's our patch based on our fix in August, 2001.
Question: should we use spin_lock_bh() instead of spin_lock()?
--------
Don't assign a same IPv6 address on a same interface.
This patch is against linux-2.5.66.
We believe this fix should be suitable on linux-2.4 tree.
(This patch itself conflicts at the first chunk...)
Thanks in advance.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Patch-Name: Don't assign a same IPv6 address on a same interface
Patch-Id: FIX_2_5_66_ADDRCONF_DUPADDR-20030330
Patch-Author: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / USAGI Project <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Credit: Yuji SEKIYA / USAGI Project <sekiya@linux-ipv6.org>,
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / USAGI Project <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
Simone Piunno <pioppo@ferrara.linux.it>
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Index: net/ipv6/addrconf.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/usagi/usagi-backport/linux25/net/ipv6/addrconf.c,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.9
retrieving revision 1.1.1.9.2.3
diff -u -r1.1.1.9 -r1.1.1.9.2.3
--- net/ipv6/addrconf.c 25 Mar 2003 04:33:45 -0000 1.1.1.9
+++ net/ipv6/addrconf.c 30 Mar 2003 13:50:41 -0000 1.1.1.9.2.3
@@ -30,6 +30,8 @@
* address validation timer.
* YOSHIFUJI Hideaki @USAGI : Privacy Extensions (RFC3041)
* support.
+ * Yuji SEKIYA @USAGI : Don't assign a same IPv6
+ * address on a same interface.
*/
#include <linux/config.h>
@@ -126,6 +128,8 @@
static void addrconf_rs_timer(unsigned long data);
static void ipv6_ifa_notify(int event, struct inet6_ifaddr *ifa);
+static int ipv6_chk_same_addr(const struct in6_addr *addr, struct net_device *dev);
+
static struct notifier_block *inet6addr_chain;
struct ipv6_devconf ipv6_devconf =
@@ -492,10 +496,21 @@
{
struct inet6_ifaddr *ifa;
int hash;
+ static spinlock_t lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
+
+ spin_lock(&lock);
+
+ /* Ignore adding duplicate addresses on an interface */
+ if (ipv6_chk_same_addr(addr, idev->dev)) {
+ spin_unlock(&lock);
+ ADBG(("ipv6_add_addr: already assigned\n"));
+ return NULL;
+ }
ifa = kmalloc(sizeof(struct inet6_ifaddr), GFP_ATOMIC);
if (ifa == NULL) {
+ spin_unlock(&lock);
ADBG(("ipv6_add_addr: malloc failed\n"));
return NULL;
}
@@ -514,6 +529,7 @@
if (idev->dead) {
read_unlock(&addrconf_lock);
kfree(ifa);
+ spin_unlock(&lock);
return NULL;
}
@@ -551,6 +567,7 @@
in6_ifa_hold(ifa);
write_unlock_bh(&idev->lock);
read_unlock(&addrconf_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&lock);
notifier_call_chain(&inet6addr_chain,NETDEV_UP,ifa);
@@ -921,6 +938,23 @@
!(ifp->flags&IFA_F_TENTATIVE)) {
if (dev == NULL || ifp->idev->dev == dev ||
!(ifp->scope&(IFA_LINK|IFA_HOST)))
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ read_unlock_bh(&addrconf_hash_lock);
+ return ifp != NULL;
+}
+
+static
+int ipv6_chk_same_addr(const struct in6_addr *addr, struct net_device *dev)
+{
+ struct inet6_ifaddr * ifp;
+ u8 hash = ipv6_addr_hash(addr);
+
+ read_lock_bh(&addrconf_hash_lock);
+ for(ifp = inet6_addr_lst[hash]; ifp; ifp=ifp->lst_next) {
+ if (ipv6_addr_cmp(&ifp->addr, addr) == 0) {
+ if (dev != NULL && ifp->idev->dev == dev)
break;
}
}
-- Hideaki YOSHIFUJI @ USAGI Project <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> GPG FP: 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF 80D8 4807 F894 E062 0EEA - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/