Re: FileSystem XFS vs RiserFS vs ext3

Bryan Whitehead (driver@jpl.nasa.gov)
Mon, 17 Mar 2003 14:21:38 -0800

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: chas williams: "[ATM] first pass at fixing atm spinlock"
Previous message: Nigel Cunningham: "Patch: Fix BUGging in ide-disk.c"
Maybe in reply to: =?Big5?B?QWxleCBMYXUgvEKrVL3l?=: "FileSystem XFS vs RiserFS vs ext3"

Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> In article <3E7556C2.7030000@thizgroup.com> you wrote:
>
>>Hi all I get basic understanding of the functions and different between
>>XFS, RiserFS and ext3. But in high volumn read write enviornment (database,
>>NFS email server etc), which will provide better preformance?
>
>
> NFS is a bit tricky. Reiser used to be broken on it, and at least from large
> XFS NFS Servers I know that they tend to be unstable, still.

I've never had problems with XFS+NFS on any of my servers... Is there a
link or something you can provide?

Thanks.

-- Bryan Whitehead SysAdmin - JPL - Interferometry Systems and Technology Phone: 818 354 2903 driver@jpl.nasa.gov

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: chas williams: "[ATM] first pass at fixing atm spinlock"
Previous message: Nigel Cunningham: "Patch: Fix BUGging in ide-disk.c"
Maybe in reply to: =?Big5?B?QWxleCBMYXUgvEKrVL3l?=: "FileSystem XFS vs RiserFS vs ext3"