Because it makes no difference at all on x86, since gcc will ignore
"const" for inline functions. At least that used to be true.
> and why on x86-64
>the movq %%gs:0, %0 inline asm is volatile with "memory" clobber?
Can't help you on that one, but it looks like it uses various helper
functions for doing the x86-64 per-processor data structures, and I bet
those helper functions are shared by _other_ users who definitely want
to have their data properly re-read. Ie "current()" may be constant in
process context, but that sure isn't true about a lot of other things in
the per-processor data structures.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/