Re: Linux-kernel-revision-control list (was: Re: Never ever use word

[Josef Roehrl]

I second that emotion.  Let's not lose track, though, of how the 
BitKeeper issue affects kernel development.  Giving the BitKeeper 
discussions their own home
achieves 2 things: keeps the kernel development list focused on kernel 
development and gets the BitKeeper issues hashed out better by making 
those its own separate forum.

Regards,

Josef

Christian Daudt wrote:

>This BitKeeper subject resurfaces every week or so and probably accounts for 
>5-10% of the linux-kernel mailing list traffic. While a terribly interesting 
>topic to some - it really isn't about the kernel. Could someone be so kind as 
>to create a linux-kernel-bitkeeper (or linux-kernel-revision-control) mailing 
>list so that these discussions (which obviously are not going away) can have 
>a proper home?
>
> cheers,
>
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>the body of a message to [e-mail]
>More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>