Re: Please revert second addition of stddef.h to list.h

Matthew Wilcox (willy@debian.org)
Sat, 15 Mar 2003 18:05:30 +0000

On Sun, Mar 16, 2003 at 01:22:00AM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote:
> Yes, although the original patch itself was correct.
> Obviously 2 patch sets that are trying to do the same
> thing have been applied post 2.5.64.
>
> Patch below would fix this...

Yes, but you're removing the wrong one. Keeping includes in alphabetical
order removes the possibility of this kind of fuck-up.

-- 
"It's not Hollywood.  War is real, war is primarily not about defeat or
victory, it is about death.  I've seen thousands and thousands of dead bodies.
Do you think I want to have an academic debate on this subject?" -- Robert Fisk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/