Re: 2.5.64-mm6

Alex Tomas (bzzz@tmi.comex.ru)
14 Mar 2003 23:10:20 +0300


>>>>> Andrew Morton (AM) writes:

AM> jlnance@unity.ncsu.edu wrote:
>>
>> Andrew, I am not sure what you mean by this. Are you saying that
>> the way ld accesses files causes the blocks on the disk to be
>> layed out poorly? That is the only thing I can think of that
>> would get fixed by copying.
>>

AM> Exactly that. ld seeks all over the file when adding new blocks
AM> to it, so with ext2 and ext3 (at least) there is poor
AM> correspondence between file offset and block indices.

hmm. I thought delayed allocation should solve this problem. Isn't it?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/