Re: is irq smp affinity good for anything?

[Mark Hounschell]

[e-mail] wrote:
> 
> Thanks so much for your comments
> 
> Yes... maybe there is also cache pingpong because common locks are in
> different cpus... I'will try it
> 
> do you know what's the best/less intrusive patch that allows
> task cpu binding?
             <---
Probably the least intrusive can be gotten here:

http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml/cpu-affinity/

Or the O(1) schedular patches. That is a little more intrusive though.

Mark