Ah, I thought there was a reason that it was a Good Thing to keep it
as a power of 2, which would mean 64kB vs 128kB, but if not then I
totally agree.
> Also, looking closer, the current limit actually seems to be _controller_
> dependent, not disk-dependent. I don't know how valid that is, but it
> looks reasonable at least in theory - while the IDE controller is mostly a
> passthrough thing, it does end up doing part of the work. So the picture
> look smore complex than just another drive blacklist.
>
> In short, the headaches just aren't worth the 127->128kB gain.
I wasn't aware of the controller issue - with that thrown in to the
mix, I see your point.
John.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/