Would the real 82801E_9 please stand up. (fwd)

Adrian Bunk (bunk@fs.tum.de)
Tue, 11 Mar 2003 20:29:45 +0100


The issue described in Dave's mail below is still present:

2.4.21-pre5-ac1:
#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82801E_9 0x2459
#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82801E_11 0x245B

2.5.64-ac3:
#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82801E_9 0x245b
#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82801E_11 PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82801E_9

Jens:
The patch that did the
#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82801E_11 PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82801E_9
in 2.5 was sent by you, could you comment on this issue?

TIA
Adrian

----- Forwarded message from Dave Jones <davej@suse.de> -----

Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 23:58:52 +0200
From: Dave Jones <davej@suse.de>
To: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Would the real 82801E_9 please stand up.

Whilst syncing 2.4.19rc1, I spotted this problem
in pci_ids.h

2.4..

#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82801E_9 0x2459

2.5..

#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82801E_9 0x245b

In a word.. eughhh

Dave.

-- 
| Dave Jones.        http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
| SuSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

----- End forwarded message -----

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/