Re: [BK PATCH] klibc for 2.5.64 - try 2

[H. Peter Anvin]

Roman Zippel wrote:
> 
> You are avoiding my question. If something goes into the kernel, the 
> kernel license would be the obvious choice. Granting additional rights or 
> using a dual license is a relatively small problem. But you must certainly 
> have a reason to choose a completely different license?
> 

I gave my reason.  You chose not to accept it, but that's not my problem.

	-hpa