> > Thus, I still think we can go with the patch I submitted before. I've
> > rediffed it against 2.5.63 (less the bits already applied).
>
> I've spent the last week reading, reviewing, and rewriting major portions
> of swsusp. I've actually been reasonably impressed, once I was able to get
> the code into a much more readable state.
>
> All in all, I think the idea of saving state to swap is dangerous for
> various reasons. However, I like some of the other concepts of the code,
Can you elaborate? I believe writing
to swap is good for user; and it works.
> and will use them in developing a more palatable mechanism of doing STDs
What is STD?
> http://ldm.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.5-power
>
Can you post cumulative diff of work-in-progress?
I am not permitted to use bk. Also please
make sure that you post the diff before
you merge it (and please Cc me).
Pavel
-- Pavel Written on sharp zaurus, because my Velo1 broke. If you have Velo you don't need...- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/